Union cabinet simplifies visa regime

The Union cabinet on Wednesday approved merger of existing tourist, business, medical and conference visa categories to make one comprehensive long-term multiple entry visa category.

The cabinet also decided that citizens of eight more countries will be eligible for e-tourist visa on arrival. Already citizens of 155 countries are eligible for e-tourist visa.

A government statement said the cabinet approved liberalisation, simplification and rationalisation of the existing visa regime.

Under the new non-permanent, non-working comprehensive visa category tourists, businessmen or people coming for medical treatment or to attend conferences or even for film shoots will be covered. The visa will be given for 10 years with multiple entry facility, said a government official.

The official added that except those covered under 10-year travel and trade visa policy, citizens of other countries would be offered five-year multiple visa for travel and trade. Further, if the stay is restricted to 60 days on a visit, the government may waive the visa fee as well. But to meet security concerns, the government will seek biometric details of the visitors.

The cabinet approval came following discussions among all stakeholders that included ministries of home, commerce and external affairs.

The original proposal for liberlisation of visa regime came from commerce ministry.

A government statement said the decision considerably ease the travel of foreigners to India for the above-mentioned legitimate purposes.

Package for PoK refugee families

Meanwhile, the Union cabinet also approved a Rs 2,000 crore development package for displaced people of Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir (PoK) living in J&K and Chammb.

The package includes approval for home ministry’s proposal to provide enhanced financial aid to 36,384 families. Each of these families will get around Rs 5.5 lakh as aid.

Source:http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/union-cabinet-simplifies-visa-regime/story-rP12IXeyK1QS5h0ONKHzzK.html

The shoddy state of start-up incubators in India

On January 16, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi concluded the Start-up India conference in New Delhi, with an action plan for how to promote entrepreneurship and young enterprises in the country.

Now, more than the start-ups, it is the ecosystem that badly needs our attention today. If we want the ecosystem to sustain, there must be an appropriate economic incentive for every member for the ‘right’ reasons.

A key stakeholder we would like to bring to attention is the incubator. For those who studied medical sciences, it is an apparatus where infants are provided with a controlled, protective environment so that they can grow and develop their immunity. Taking this metaphor over to our case, the government (read, parent of the house) is paying the incubator (read, doctors) to provide an environment for the start-up (read, baby) where it can develop a robust business model (read, immunity against the external environment).

Let us now bring some sophistication in our argument. First, the prelude or why you need incubators.In a study conducted by Joseph Eshun in 2004, incubators and the roles they played for the development of the economy were highlighted. First, they facilitate access to talent, technology and capital.

Second, they are key institutions in lobbying with policy-makers for entrepreneurship. Third, incubators perform brokering activity, mediating between start-ups and resource providers. Finally, incubators act as a one-stop shop for start-ups, where they can get administrative assistance, time, discounted real estate, mentoring and practice their operations over and over again.

The second phase is to understand their status in India. According to the “Fuelling Entrepreneurship” report published by the Department of Science and Technology, there were 68 technology business incubators, 18 Science and Technology Entrepreneurs Parks (STEPs) and 38 business accelerators/incubators in the country as of 2014. In addition, according to the recently released Start-up India Action Plan, 35 new incubators are planned to be set up on a PPP basis and 50 new bio-incubators are planned to be established though the Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC).

But first compare these numbers to the nearly 98,000 businesses registered in the country in 2014, according to the World Bank, or the fact that there are over 3,000 business incubators in the US. Add to this, many of the existing ones are having an air of destitution around them and are struggling to stay afloat. The picture isn’t really as pretty any more!
What could be the reasons? We had discussions with multiple incubators and incubatees, and we observed four prominent reasons across the board.

1. Working capital: (Where is the cash?)

Incubators face significant working capital concerns as they have limited sources of funds besides government corpus and, in some cases, philanthropic donations.

The director of one Bangalore-based incubator mentioned that “we have working capital problems of our own. To manage self-financed incubators, we must constantly be on the lookout for donations or investments from our members. Typically, these are our member investors themselves. But such investments are few and occasional, and budgeting the cash flows based on these demands is taxing.”

On the other end of the spectrum lie incubators that are housed within academic institutions. The dean who overlooks the technology business incubator at one of north India’s most famous engineering colleges said that “our biggest concern is the inherent bureaucracy and, in most cases, their lack of understanding of our business. We have often been asked to show results and maintain a healthy financial statement. To do that on a large-scale is almost impossible. We acquire funds and grants in the name of start-ups, not ourselves. We typically survive on small fees and other budget allocations. In our case, the university has looked at the technology business incubator positively, but quite a few of my colleagues from across India face a completely different scenario. They are effectively competing against their campus placements—a challenge every such manager feels tied down when competing against. In fact, rarely do parents send students for starting a business, it is typically jobs they are after.”

2. Muted industry response: (Why should I support the new kids?)

The one-line response from the industry often is “why should you help your competitors?” The answer is simple—start-ups work in a different way than traditional businesses. If one works, learn from it, absorb it—don’t fight it.“It is also imperative for them (industry) to ensure that they critique the problems they had to face and make the next generation of start-ups deal with newer problems,” said Sandeep, a graduated incubatee from NIT Calicut’s technology business incubator. He added that, 25 years ago, Kerala-based start-ups had to go to business houses, who would lend money to some founders philanthropically. “But, can the philanthropic model continue?”

3. Lack of non-monetary resources (No mentors, no training. Do what you wish)

Even if we keep aside the financial and mentoring aspects of the incubators, a lot still has to be provided by them. For instance, servers, electricity backup, high-speed internet connection (at least up to 10Mbps) and legal advisory. Without such services, the start-ups could typically end up allocating a lot of useful capital to activities that are not core to their business, constantly leaving them with little to remain afloat. Many incubators, especially academic institution based, do not have a full-time professional incubator manager. Many a times, it is a professor or a PhD student who doubles up into the role of
managing the incubator. Thus, the administration of incubator suffers, and there is a lack of vision and a long-term strategy.

4. Bad location (Why should start-ups settle in the suburbs?)

Many of the university-based incubators located in non-metro cities face difficulty in getting mentors and industry connects for their start-ups due to the locational disadvantage. “An incubator has to be in a happening place, for both start-ups and mentors to access it, and for conducting quality networking events. “Consider the case of Microsoft Ventures in Bangalore, it is on MG Road, which is the heart of the city, you can’t have a better location than that”, said Arjun Pillai, co-founder of Profoundis, which has been part of multiple incubators and accelerators like Start-up Village Kochi, Microsoft venture accelerator and Start-up Chile. Can university-based incubators possibly think of renting a space in a more happening location rather than merely allocating a building within their premises?

Worse comes into the picture when government officials have tried to ‘help’ by providing land in remote areas for technology start-ups. It is nearly impossible for such a start-up to even avail basic IT infrastructure—let alone build the next Facebook. There is a huge reason why we hear start-ups from Mumbai, Gurgaon and Bangalore—not Manjlegaon, Gohana and Byasanagar.

Now, there are some options that incubators and policy-makers could consider, going forward.To overcome financial constraints, larger corporations could be encouraged ‘adopt’ specific incubators;

Strategically setting up incubators at such locations which offer greater industry interactions; Setting up visits to the office places of mentors and idols for the incubatees;
Promoting peer-working between start-ups through frequent networking sessions or in-groups;

Incubators for product-based start-ups could look at the ‘hackcelerator’ model, where in specific ‘warehouses’ are maintained for use of 3D printing, tooling and manufacturing expertise;

Offering default enrolment into a start-up professionals’ club/associations which gives peer recognition.

In the end, policies are great. Momentum is better. However, the right people needed to drive the momentum is of utmost importance. Incubators are not just middlemen, they are the reasons start-ups exist in the first place.

Source:http://www.financialexpress.com/industry/jobs/the-shoddy-state-of-start-up-incubators-in-india/390995/

Modern Startups Solve Real Problems

The desire to change the world drives successful entrepreneurs. They are the ones who love the journey more than the destination. Capturing the reality behind the balloon of ‘Startup India’, Suveen Sinha wants the world to read his latest book ‘Tip of the Iceberg’ and believes, “Anyone thinking of setting up their own company or in any way interested in the start-up revolution sweeping the country should read my book to know the reality and the romance of it, to know what it really takes. At times it is extremely rewarding, but not always.”

A journalist for about 21 years, Suveen Sinha discusses all you would ever want to know about startup India!

While others believe that the era of startups is about to end, but you say that it is just the tip of an iceberg.

One and a half to two years ago, a lot of people in India wanted to be Steve Jobs. So I started meeting Indian entrepreneurs to see if they had gone through the kind of ordeals Jobs had faced, or if they had it in them to survive those ordeals. After all, being an entrepreneur entails constantly worrying about money, sacrificing your personal life, and the responsibility of other people’s lives and families.

Avnish Bajaj went to Tihar, Vijay Shekhar Sharma used to go back to his house only in the dead of the night to avoid the landlord, Kunal Bahl scraped plastic off things at a factory for Rs 6,550 a month, Phanindra Sama had to take refuge in Vipassana, Mu Sigma founder Dhiraj Rajaram went to a dinner on a day he had three of his wisdom teeth taken out because he did not want to miss the deal. I found fascinating stories of bleak struggle, abysmal failure, and astounding success.

All the people I mentioned bounced back. They are made of stern stuff. What’s more, they have the confidence and swagger of someone who faced adversity before and came out triumphant. They look at the current lean times as a blip. They will come back.

What triggered the era startups and what is driving the force?

The modern startups, the prominent ones anyway, are borne out of a clear need. They solve real problems. The e-commerce guys provide access to people in big cities and small towns. Ask the mother of a newborn how big a difference it makes to have diapers delivered to your doorstep. What if you want to buy a dress but are too busy on weekdays and too sane to brave the weekend traffic to go to Select City Walk, or to take a train from Ambala to Delhi? Isn’t it a blessing to just order online and have clothes, food, medicine, plumbers, carpenters, and electricians come to you? Then there are the ride-hailing apps. In a country where public transport sucks, these are a real blessing. It is this need for a solution that gave birth to the start-ups, drives them, and will drive them always.

So, everyone produces something and is a consumer to everything?

I doubt that. Most of today’s start-ups are not about production, they are about distribution, delivery, and access. They are facilitators. Uber is the world’s largest transport company but does not manufacture cars, it just brings them to you quickly, efficiently, and cheaply. So I guess currency will remain current, even if it morphs at some point into a digital one such as a mobile wallet or even bitcoin.

Startups also need capital. What about people who want to do something but have fewer funds to invest?

The true entrepreneur is driven by her desire to change the status quo, solve a problem, or give shape to her ideas. She does not care much about money. In my book, you will find many instances of people who built great companies despite dealing with an acute shortage of money. Some, in fact, turned their back on money from their salaried jobs to build their own companies. If you are doing something meaningful, if you are solving a real problem, money will come. It’s like what Rancho says in 3 Idiots, chase excellence and money will chase you.

Please suggest few pointers that people need to keep in mind before starting their own business.

1. Do not do it if you do not believe in it.
2. Do not do it for the money.
3. Do not do it for the glamour.
4. Do it because, deep down in your heart, you know you just have to do it, because you know how to do it, and that knowledge is too much to hide inside you.
5. Do it for the love of it. Only then will you be able to cope with the realities of being an entrepreneur, which is very different from billion dollar valuations and being a media celebrity.

When biggest online players end in bankruptcy, what is the way forward for people who aim to base their business on the internet?

The biggest online players may or may not end in bankruptcy. The big ones in India are still doing reasonably well. That is why funding continues to flow in, as seen in the recent infusion in Paytm and Hike Messenger at very good valuations. The ones to fall on bad times are those that that burning cash was the best way. Some of them were not by real entrepreneurs. Dhiraj Rajaram of Mu Sigma, one of the heroes in the book, says there is a love marriage entrepreneur and there is an arranged marriage entrepreneur. The love marriage one falls in love with an idea and just has to do it. The arranged marriage one decides to be an entrepreneur and then looks for what to do. The latter ones often find it more difficult, especially if they do it at the behest of overseas fund houses or incubators.

Startups revolutionising India’s healthcare sector

New Delhi: Healthcare startups are coming up in a big way in India, recognising the need for making quality healthcare accessible to country’s billion plus population.

Six to eight percent of investments in Business-to-Consumer (B2C) startups in India are made in the healthcare sector, reveals a joint study by FICCI and KPMG in India titled – ‘Indian healthcare startups – An inside look into funding’.

Launched on Thursday, the knowledge paper evaluates the role and need for healthcare startups in India, their evolution in the sector and the funding scenario.

“Superior outcomes in healthcare in India will be better achieved with innovations in health practices and products, and I urge private sector to give priority to innovations and best practices,” said Union health minister JP Nadda at the FICCI HEAL, 2016, conference.

The joint report was launched during the conference.

“What we need today is a unified approach for long-term solutions that would help in optimizing disease-care to preventive and promotive care as well as patient centricity though data-driven efficient technologies. Fostering Start-ups and Entrepreneurship will provide the requisite innovative approach for achieving these reforms,” said Dr Nandakumar Jairam, chair, FICCI health services committee.

Startups are the way forward to deliver quality healthcare.

“According to the NASSCOM Start-up Ecosystem Report 2015, India serves as the fastest growing startup base worldwide. The sector has already secured ample traction from investors owing to its huge potential,” said Vishal Bali, co-chair, FICCI health services committee.

Many startups have moved away from traditional healthcare delivery models to asset light, technology based and enabling platforms for patients and healthcare providers. However, start-ups continue to face some encounters in terms of funding, incubation and regulatory environment.

“The government’s Startup India initiative intends to bridge some of the challenges and provides encouraging ecosystem for start-ups. The creation of conducive ecosystem for healthcare start-ups will be boon for the healthcare sector,” said Nilaya Varma, partner and head, government and healthcare, KPMG-India.

With a doctor patient ratio as low as 1:1700 (in proportion to the total population), stumped penetration of healthcare in rural areas and a low medically insured population, the potential for healthcare startups to emerge as a key member in the healthcare ecosystem is vast.

*Key findings

*Start-ups can act as a much needed facilitator to help approximately 70% of the rural population

* Mobile and internet platforms can be one of the means to address India’s deficient healthcare facilities

*It takes 10 to 15 years to introduce a new product in the market

*India’s public spending on the healthcare sector: 1.4% of the GDP

*Private sector could play a crucial hand in the growth and development of healthcare start-ups

Source from:http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/startups-revolutionising-india-s-heathcare-sector/story-zFujgX7GBDjFxD7zEfIwYO.html